eMAIL #9

 Dear Ministers et al, [Police & Energy] 

RE: QUESTION Regarding Police Surveillance and Attendance in the circumstance of a Government corporate body wishing to access private property without permission 

On November 4 2021 a TASnetworks Vegetation Officer, when I denied his contractors’ access to our property, he advised me, paraphrased, that if he deemed it necessary ‘his contractors would attend my property, access it via a ‘cherry picker’ under the supervision of the police if necessary’ – or words very much to that effect. ...................... Having had some time to consider all the implications of such an assertion I am left wondering under just what circumstance a member of TASnetworks staff – or indeed any other Government authority – could uninitiate such an action and with what veracity? ...................... I find myself quite disturbed that any citizen might be subject to such ‘bureaucratic bullying’ given that in this instance it has all the hallmarks of ‘ageism and rankism’. Aside from any of that it is extraordinarily poor marketing under the circumstances. ...................... I look forward with considerable interest to whatever advice I can receive in order to truly contextualise the experiences we have been exposed to in this instance. ...................... Yours sincerely, ...................... Ray Norman .

FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES: CN21-216239 - 8000024536 40 Delamere Cres TREVALLYN TAS 7250 - Vegetation Management Dispute … https://taznetworkissues.blogspot.com/