eMAIL #8

 

Dear XXXXX

RE: CN21-216239 - 8000024536 40 Delamere Cres TREVALLYN TAS 7250 - Vegetation Management Dispute 

 I acknowledge your email, however I vigorously dispute the whole conceptual premise and the consequent ‘deeming’ around which it is framed. Moreover, you make assertions but you provide no evidence whatsoever for the easement you assert TASnetworks has across our property for instance. If you have such evidence why haven’t you provided it? .................. To be clear, I was in dispute in regard to the propositions put to me by TASnetworks from the very first instance, and I continue to dispute the propositions you pose as equitable ‘solutions to my problem’. Rather, any ‘problem’ here rests with your ‘corporation’ given that TASnetworks is the ‘service provider’ with obligations that fall to your ‘corporate entity’ that are not being willingly met currently and thus ‘the problem here’ is inextricably linked to TASnetworks obligations to its customer at 42a Delamere Crescent with whom I have no relationship whatsoever. .................. TASnetworks’ vegetation crew did as you say attend, and as agreed on the 4th of November 2021, in order to mitigate the perceived safety issues, and yes the vegetation was trimmed the minimum required from the tree (500mm) with a hand saw for that purpose. I agreed to that outcome ‘for safety reasons alone’ and as an interim measure until an equitable outcome is arrived at. Nothing that you have presented to us thus far satisfies our expectations. .................. Please see … https://taznetworkissues.blogspot.com/2021/11/email-7.html .................. Regards,... Ray Norman